Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented Nov 7, 2019

Now that we also warn about MaybUninit::uninit().assume_init(), just telling people "use MaybeUninit" isn't always sufficient. And anyway this seems like an important enough point to mention it here.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 7, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Nov 7, 2019

💖

r? @Centril
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 7, 2019

📌 Commit a5be036 has been approved by Centril

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Centril and unassigned petrochenkov Nov 7, 2019
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 7, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
invalid_value lint: fix help text

Now that we also warn about `MaybUninit::uninit().assume_init()`, just telling people "use `MaybeUninit`" isn't always sufficient. And anyway this seems like an important enough point to mention it here.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
invalid_value lint: fix help text

Now that we also warn about `MaybUninit::uninit().assume_init()`, just telling people "use `MaybeUninit`" isn't always sufficient. And anyway this seems like an important enough point to mention it here.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
invalid_value lint: fix help text

Now that we also warn about `MaybUninit::uninit().assume_init()`, just telling people "use `MaybeUninit`" isn't always sufficient. And anyway this seems like an important enough point to mention it here.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #63793 (Have tidy ensure that we document all `unsafe` blocks in libcore)
 - #64696 ([rustdoc] add sub settings)
 - #65916 (syntax: move stuff around)
 - #66087 (Update some build-pass ui tests to use check-pass where applicable)
 - #66182 (invalid_value lint: fix help text)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #63793 (Have tidy ensure that we document all `unsafe` blocks in libcore)
 - #64696 ([rustdoc] add sub settings)
 - #65916 (syntax: move stuff around)
 - #66087 (Update some build-pass ui tests to use check-pass where applicable)
 - #66182 (invalid_value lint: fix help text)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit a5be036 into rust-lang:master Nov 8, 2019
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the invalid-value branch November 9, 2019 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants